Heléna Elias [1], Francesca De Luca [2]

*from Latin mātrīx (dam, womb), from māter (mother)

ATLAS: MATRIX: A COLLABORATIVE PRACTICE (Open Format Documentation)

This short piece tells about a mindful collaboration, one where the act of collaborating – intentional but not overly planned – resulted in an open-ended installation/dispositive that called for ulterior collaboration, enabling the spectators to play with the elements while generating, at same time, a reflection around the collaborative endeavour itself.

An introductory story in the form of a diary is followed by DIY guidelines, indicating a replicable formula for co-laborating – [from Latincum (together) + laborare (to practice)] – in transdisciplinary settings.

Atlas: MATRIX* emerged, at first, as a space of dialogue and confrontation where our individual research paths- a reflective practice generated by the creation of ceramic pieces (Elias 2016), and a genealogy of childbirth pain in Lisbon’s biomedical settings (De Luca 2018) – conjoined in an inquiry on the colonial legacy of the Tropical Garden and its surroundings.

The site-specific installation was elaborated during the first #Colleex international workshop (July 2017) in the Tropical Garden of Belém (the western area of Lisbon) on an invitation of EBANO Collective, host of the event.

The event constituted, for Heléna, an opportunity to merge a previous research carried under herPhD, regarding the public art and urban design of the Portuguese World Exhibition (1940) as the urban matrix of Belém riverside. It also propelled Francesca’s enquire into the colonial imprint on the epistemological and political configurations of childbirth pain and practices on the pregnant body in Portuguese obstetrics.

From such we developed a set of correspondences to stage our work at #Colleex. The matrix, referring to an object or concept from where something originates, was our common ground: matrix was the name given to the uterus until the 19th century in midwifery, but also the fragments from which ceramic objects may take shape; matrix referred to a geological structure that frames the rocks, but also an architectonic model that served as a paradigm for replications (as the ecclesia matrix, the “mother church”); matrix could be the portion of soil that encases, through a dominant colour, the main characteristics of the area, but also indicate a group of symbols organized in a rectangle used to solve particular mathematical problems.

All these connotations implied an idea of (re)production, indicating the condition of generative possibilities withheld in specific configurations. The matrix we were looking at and working on was a very material endeavour.

[1] EBANO Collective invited artist, FBA Faculty of Fine Arts – University of Lisbon, VICARTE, FCT post-doc Grant SFRH / BPD / 63249 / 2009

[2] Member of EBANO Collective, PhD candidate at ICS Institute of Social Sciences – University of Lisbon, FCT grant SFRH/BD/93020/2013

AN ATLAS DIARY
COLLABORATIVE INSTALLATION – A FORMULA

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bishop, C. (2012) Artificial Hells, Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship,

Bishop, C. Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics, [accessed 05-02-2017] http://www.teamgal.com/production/1701/SS04October.pdf

Coessens; K. Douglas, A. Crispin, D. (2009) The artistic turn. A manifesto. Leuven University Press

De Luca, F. 2018. “God was the first an aesthetist”. The labouring woman, the doctor and pain at the turn of the 20th century in Lisbon. In Etnografica.

Elias, H. 2008 Arte Pública das Administrações Central e Local do Estado Novo em Lisboa: Sistemas de encomenda da CML e do MOPC/MOP (1938-1960). Barcelona: Universidade de Barcelona

Elias, H. 2016 Livro dos sintomas II, sculpture installation at the Botanical Musuem of Universidade de Coimbra, Futuros disputados – VI Congresso da Associação Portuguesa de Antropologia, Coimbra, Portugal, 1-3 de junho 2016.

Hunt, N. R. 2016″Peface”, In Traces of the Future: An Archaeology of Medical Science in Africa. P. Geissler, G. Lachenal, J. Manton and N. Tousignant, eds. University of Chicago Press, pp. 9-13

Ingold, T. 2010,”The textility of making” in Cambridge Journal of Economics, n 34, pp 91-102

Matos, P. Ferraz de 2006,As “Corês” do Imperio: representações raciais no Império Colonial Português, Lisboa: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais

Ravetz, A 2005,“News from Home. Reflection on Fine Art and Anthropology”, in Visualizing Anthropology. A. Grimshaw and A. Ravetz, eds. Bristol, Portland: New Media Intellect, pp. 69-79.

Rich, M. 2016, “The Curse of Civilised Woman: Race, Gender and the Pain of Childbirth in Nineteenth-Century American Medicine” in Gender & History, Vol.28 No.1, pp. 57–76.

Vargaftig 2016,Des Empires en carton : les Expositions coloniales au Portugal et en Italie (1918-1940).  Madrid: Casa de Velázquez

X. Andrade, Ana María Forero y Fiamma Montezemolo 2017, “Los trabajos de campo, lo experimental y el quehacer etnográfico”. Íconos. Revista de CienciasSociales Vol. 21, N.3, pp. 11-22

 

Advertisements